From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm-s390: streamline memslot handling - rebased Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:09:39 +0300 Message-ID: <4A2CFF83.8040202@redhat.com> References: <1243952771-32428-1-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1243952771-32428-4-git-send-email-ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090605205312.GA13471@amt.cnet> <4A2CED2E.6030904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4A2CF1A2.8090904@redhat.com> <4A2CFE9B.6020300@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cotte@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com To: Christian Ehrhardt Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:35203 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755056AbZFHMJl (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:09:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A2CFE9B.6020300@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hmm ... would that be worth a clarifying patch to atomic_ops.txt that > confused me in the first place ? If it confused you, it probably confuses others. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function