From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
avi@redhat.com, Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v2 2/2] kvm: use POLLHUP to close an irqfd instead of an explicit ioctl
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:48:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A35C482.2040809@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090614132843.GC10646@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6221 bytes --]
[ restoring poor Davide's proper email address. Sorry for the constant
fat-fingering of your addr, Davide! ]
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 08:53:11AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:48:12AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> +static void
>>>> +irqfd_disconnect(struct _irqfd *irqfd)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct kvm *kvm;
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&irqfd->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> + kvm = rcu_dereference(irqfd->kvm);
>>>> + rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->kvm, NULL);
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&irqfd->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!kvm)
>>>> + return;
>>>>
>>>> mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>>>> - kvm_set_irq(kvm, KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID, irqfd->gsi, 1);
>>>> - kvm_set_irq(kvm, KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID, irqfd->gsi, 0);
>>>> + list_del(&irqfd->list);
>>>> mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * It is important to not drop the kvm reference until the next grace
>>>> + * period because there might be lockless references in flight up
>>>> + * until then
>>>> + */
>>>> + synchronize_srcu(&irqfd->srcu);
>>>> + kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So irqfd object will persist after kvm goes away, until eventfd is closed?
>>>
>>>
>> Yep, by design. It becomes part of the eventfd and is thus associated
>> with its lifetime. Consider it as if we made our own anon-fd
>> implementation for irqfd and the lifetime looks similar. The difference
>> is that we are reusing eventfd and its interface semantics.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> static int
>>>> irqfd_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
>>>> {
>>>> struct _irqfd *irqfd = container_of(wait, struct _irqfd, wait);
>>>> + unsigned long flags = (unsigned long)key;
>>>>
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * The wake_up is called with interrupts disabled. Therefore we need
>>>> - * to defer the IRQ injection until later since we need to acquire the
>>>> - * kvm->lock to do so.
>>>> - */
>>>> - schedule_work(&irqfd->work);
>>>> + if (flags & POLLIN)
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * The POLLIN wake_up is called with interrupts disabled.
>>>> + * Therefore we need to defer the IRQ injection until later
>>>> + * since we need to acquire the kvm->lock to do so.
>>>> + */
>>>> + schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (flags & POLLHUP) {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * The POLLHUP is called unlocked, so it theoretically should
>>>> + * be safe to remove ourselves from the wqh using the locked
>>>> + * variant of remove_wait_queue()
>>>> + */
>>>> + remove_wait_queue(irqfd->wqh, &irqfd->wait);
>>>> + flush_work(&irqfd->inject);
>>>> + irqfd_disconnect(irqfd);
>>>> +
>>>> + cleanup_srcu_struct(&irqfd->srcu);
>>>> + kfree(irqfd);
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And it is removed by this function when eventfd is closed.
>>> But what prevents the kvm module from going away, meanwhile?
>>>
>>>
>> Well, we hold a reference to struct kvm until we call
>> irqfd_disconnect(). If kvm closes first, we disconnect and disassociate
>> all references to kvm leaving irqfd->kvm = NULL. Likewise, if irqfd
>> closes first, we disassociate with kvm with the above quoted logic. In
>> either case, we are holding a kvm reference up until that "disconnect"
>> point. Therefore kvm should not be able to disappear before that
>> disconnect, and after that point we do not care.
>>
>
> Yes, we do care.
>
> Here's the scenario in more detail:
>
> - kvm is closed
> - irq disconnect is called
> - kvm is put
> - kvm module is removed: all irqs are disconnected
> - eventfd closes and triggers callback into removed kvm module
> - crash
>
[ lightbulb turns on]
Ah, now I see the point you were making. I thought you were talking
about the .text in kvm_set_irq() (which would be protected by my
kvm_get_kvm() reference afaict). But you are actually talking about the
irqfd .text itself. Indeed, you are correct that is this currently a
race. Good catch!
>
>> If that is not sufficient to prevent kvm.ko from going away in the
>> middle, then IMO kvm_get_kvm() has a bug, not irqfd. ;) However, I
>> believe everything is actually ok here.
>>
>> -Greg
>>
>>
>
>
> BTW, why can't we remove irqfds in kvm_release?
>
Well, this would be ideal but we run into that bi-directional reference
thing that we talked about earlier and we both agree is non-trivial to
solve. Solving this locking problem would incidentally also pave the
way for restoring the DEASSIGN feature, so patches welcome! In the
meantime, I think we can close the hole you found with the following
patch (build-tested only):
commit f3a8dccc9e815599438e9feb0ea53e8eb10ad2b3
Author: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Date: Sun Jun 14 23:37:49 2009 -0400
KVM: make irqfd take kvm.ko module reference
Michael Tsirkin pointed out that we currently have a race between
someone
holding an irqfd reference and an rmmod against kvm.ko. This patch
closes
that hole by making sure that irqfd holds a kvm.ko reference for its
lifetime.
Found-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 2c8028c..67e4eca 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/eventfd.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
/*
* --------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -123,6 +124,7 @@ irqfd_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int
sync, void
*key)
cleanup_srcu_struct(&irqfd->srcu);
kfree(irqfd);
+ module_put(THIS_MODULE);
}
return 0;
@@ -176,6 +178,7 @@ kvm_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi, int flags)
if (ret < 0)
goto fail;
+ __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 267 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 266 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-04 12:48 [KVM PATCH v2 0/2] irqfd: use POLLHUP notification for close() Gregory Haskins
2009-06-04 12:48 ` [KVM PATCH v2 1/2] Allow waiters to be notified about the eventfd file* going away, and give Gregory Haskins
2009-06-04 12:48 ` [KVM PATCH v2 2/2] kvm: use POLLHUP to close an irqfd instead of an explicit ioctl Gregory Haskins
2009-06-14 11:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-14 12:53 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-14 13:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-15 3:39 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-15 9:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-15 12:08 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-15 12:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-18 5:16 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-18 6:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-18 12:00 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-18 12:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-18 14:03 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-18 14:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-18 16:29 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 15:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-19 16:07 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-15 3:48 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2009-06-04 14:02 ` [KVM PATCH v2 0/2] irqfd: use POLLHUP notification for close() Avi Kivity
2009-06-12 3:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-12 4:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-14 12:38 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-14 12:51 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A35C482.2040809@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox