From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Handle vcpu init/sipi by calling a function on vcpu Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:03:39 +0300 Message-ID: <4A361C7B.2050000@redhat.com> References: <1244976742-22926-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1244976742-22926-4-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41705 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751611AbZFOKDd (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:03:33 -0400 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5FA3a8l007760 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:03:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1244976742-22926-4-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/14/2009 01:52 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > Instead of having special case in vcpu event loop. > > I'm a little worried about two vcpus INITing each other simultaneously and deadlocking. INIT/SIPI are async events, the initiator should not wait for them. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function