From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Handle vcpu init/sipi by calling a function on vcpu Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:26:29 +0300 Message-ID: <4A3621D5.6050703@redhat.com> References: <1244976742-22926-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1244976742-22926-4-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <4A361C7B.2050000@redhat.com> <20090615101137.GK19508@redhat.com> <4A361EFD.6060706@redhat.com> <20090615101646.GL19508@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:50250 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750930AbZFOK0X (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:26:23 -0400 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5FAQQpK013257 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:26:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090615101646.GL19508@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/15/2009 01:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> A generic on_vcpu_async() would need to allocate, that might be expoitable. >> >> > Then what about processing events while waiting in on_vcpu()? > > Could work, but prefer a simpler solution. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function