From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Configuration vs. compat hints [was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 03/13] qemu: add routines to manage PCI capabilities] Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:12:30 +0300 Message-ID: <4A3648BE.2050403@redhat.com> References: <20090610145540.GI19375@poweredge.glommer> <20090610150129.GC28601@redhat.com> <200906101624.30659.paul@codesourcery.com> <20090610174301.GC7416@shareable.org> <20090610182227.GN28601@redhat.com> <20090610192702.GH7416@shareable.org> <1244796209.16425.20.camel@blaa> <4A326C7E.3020309@codemonkey.ws> <1244822007.30522.68.camel@blaa> <4A327E87.6080005@codemonkey.ws> <1244825333.26769.20.camel@blaa> <4A34ADA9.80709@redhat.com> <1245056955.6891.33.camel@blaa> <4A36314A.8040206@redhat.com> <4A364316.5070402@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Jamie Lokier , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Carsten Otte , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Glauber Costa , Rusty Russell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Blue Swirl , Christian Borntraeger , Paul Brook To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:40046 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750929AbZFONOp (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:14:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A364316.5070402@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/15/2009 03:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>>> device tree lacking said attribute, distinguish between a device tree >>>>> from an old version of qemu (i.e. use the old default) and a partial >>>>> device tree from the VM manager (i.e. use the new default) ? >>>>> >>>> -baseline 0.10 >>> >>> That's a version number :-) >>> >>> (I was responding to Anthony's "you don't need a version number") >> >> If you want to prevent incompatibilities, you need to make everything >> new (potentially including bugfixes) non-default. Eventually the >> default configuration becomes increasingly unusable and you need a >> new baseline. You must still be able to fall back to the old >> baseline for older guests. I don't think games with configuration >> files can hide that. > How do you add a new attribute to the device tree and, when a supplied > > -M pc1 > -M pc2 Certainly preferable to -baseline. > This is pretty easy to maintain with config files. Let's not tie the two together. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function