From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] qemu-kvm introduce -maxcpus argument
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:23:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3B9F4D.3000907@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090619141527.GA18392@redhat.com>
On 06/19/2009 04:15 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:59:57PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This one introduces a -maxcpus setting, allowing the user to specify
>> the maximum number of vCPUs the system can have, as discussed with Gleb
>> earlier in the week.
>
> What is the maximum value for the 'maxcpus' setting for KVM ?
Right now it is still 16, however I plan to change this.
> libvirt currently does
>
> fd = open("/dev/kvm")
> r = ioctl(fd, KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION, KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS);
>
> to figure out what the maximum allowed vCPUs will be for KVM,
> and currently it is returning 16 IIRC.
Interesting, this will need to be addressed as well. I have plans to
introduce a mechanism telling the kernel where the limit will be, in
order to allow it to allocate data structures in a reasonable manner.
>> @@ -5666,6 +5667,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **e
>> exit(1);
>> }
>> break;
>> + case QEMU_OPTION_maxcpus:
>> + max_cpus = atoi(optarg);
>> + if ((max_cpus< 1) || (max_cpus> machine->max_cpus)) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "Invalid number of CPUs\n");
>> + exit(1);
>> + }
> This implies the limit (for x86 pc machine at least) is now 255. Is that
> the correct interpretation on my part ?
Actually the 255 limit is tied to ACPI. Once we support ACPI 3.0 and
x2apic, it will get much worse. Be afraid, be very afraid :-) To be
honest, that is going to be a while before we get to that, but I hope
to get to it eventually.
I strongly recommend you try not to impose static limits within libvirt
for the number of vCPUs.
I guess it will become a tricky issue who is telling who what the limit
is. Ideally I would like to see the kernel limit becoming unlimited and
the restrictions being set by userland.
Cheers,
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-19 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 13:59 [patch] qemu-kvm introduce -maxcpus argument Jes Sorensen
2009-06-19 14:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-06-19 14:23 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2009-06-21 12:53 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-19 15:24 ` Amit Shah
2009-06-22 7:11 ` Jes Sorensen
2009-06-21 12:54 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A3B9F4D.3000907@gmail.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@gmail.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox