From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8 v3] KVM support for 1GB pages Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:43:40 +0300 Message-ID: <4A3F524C.8030902@redhat.com> References: <1245417389-5527-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <4A3CC1FA.2070900@redhat.com> <20090622094013.GD5139@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Joerg Roedel Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:57555 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754904AbZFVJm5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:42:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090622094013.GD5139@amd.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/22/2009 12:40 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> Can you describe how the code fails with shadow paging? >> > > After the rework it even fails to boot a guest with gbpages enabled. This week > is a bit tight but I will debug this further next week. > Does the failure happen only when both guest/host use gbpages, or does it also happen if gbpages is disabled on either one? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function