From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mtosatti@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
markmc@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pass write value to in_range pointers
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:41:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A40BF58.8060603@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A40A5D5.4080208@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1892 bytes --]
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/22/2009 07:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:45:00AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>
>>> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> It seems that a lot of complexity and trickiness with iosignalfd is
>>>> handling the group/item relationship, which comes about because kvm
>>>> does
>>>> not currently let a device on the bus claim a write transaction
>>>> based on the
>>>> value written. This could be greatly simplified if the value written
>>>> was passed to the in_range check for write operation. We could then
>>>> simply make each kvm_iosignalfd a device on the bus.
>>>>
>>>> What does everyone think of the following lightly tested patch?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>> Its interesting, but I am not convinced its necessary. We
>>> created the
>>> group/item layout because iosignalfds are unique in that they are
>>> probably the only IO device that wants to do some kind of address
>>> aliasing.
>>>
>>
>> We actually already have aliasing: is_write flag is used for this
>> purpose. Actually, it's possible to remove is_write by passing
>> a null pointer in write_val for reads. I like this a bit less as
>> the code generated is less compact ... Avi, what do you think?
>>
>
> Greg, won't Michael's patch eliminate a big chunk from your iosignalfd
> patches? Seems like a win to me.
Well, it really just moves that hunk from eventfd.c to kvm_main.c, where
I don't think anyone else will use it by iosignalfd. But if that is
what everyone wants, I guess I have no choice.
>
>> One is enough :)
>> Seriously, do you see that this saves you all of RCU, linked lists and
>> counters? You don't need to keep track of iofds, you don't need to
>> implement your own lookup logic - you just use the kvm device
>> and that's it.
>>
>>
>
> Yup.
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 266 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 0:30 [KVM PATCH v8 0/3] iosignalfd Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 0:30 ` [KVM PATCH v8 1/3] KVM: make io_bus interface more robust Gregory Haskins
2009-06-25 14:22 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-25 14:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-25 14:56 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 0:30 ` [KVM PATCH v8 2/3] KVM: add per-vm limit on the maximum number of io-devices supported Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19 0:30 ` [KVM PATCH v8 3/3] KVM: add iosignalfd support Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 10:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 12:13 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 12:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-06-22 12:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 12:56 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 13:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 13:12 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 13:13 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 13:04 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 13:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 13:19 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 14:30 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 14:39 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 14:28 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC] pass write value to in_range pointers Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 15:45 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 16:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 16:29 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 17:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 4:04 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 11:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 11:52 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 11:56 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 12:01 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 12:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 11:53 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 9:54 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 9:52 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 11:41 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2009-06-23 11:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 8:56 ` [KVM PATCH v8 3/3] KVM: add iosignalfd support Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 9:57 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 10:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 11:24 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 11:33 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 11:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 11:40 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 13:22 ` Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A40BF58.8060603@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox