public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	markmc@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pass write value to in_range pointers
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:41:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A40BF58.8060603@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A40A5D5.4080208@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1892 bytes --]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/22/2009 07:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:45:00AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>   
>>> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>     
>>>> It seems that a lot of complexity and trickiness with iosignalfd is
>>>> handling the group/item relationship, which comes about because kvm
>>>> does
>>>> not currently let a device on the bus claim a write transaction
>>>> based on the
>>>> value written.  This could be greatly simplified if the value written
>>>> was passed to the in_range check for write operation.  We could then
>>>> simply make each kvm_iosignalfd a device on the bus.
>>>>
>>>> What does everyone think of the following lightly tested patch?
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>    Its interesting, but I am not convinced its necessary.  We
>>> created the
>>> group/item layout because iosignalfds are unique in that they are
>>> probably the only IO device that wants to do some kind of address
>>> aliasing.
>>>      
>>
>> We actually already have aliasing: is_write flag is used for this
>> purpose. Actually, it's possible to remove is_write by passing
>> a null pointer in write_val for reads. I like this a bit less as
>> the code generated is less compact ... Avi, what do you think?
>>    
>
> Greg, won't Michael's patch eliminate a big chunk from your iosignalfd
> patches?  Seems like a win to me.

Well, it really just moves that hunk from eventfd.c to kvm_main.c, where
I don't think anyone else will use it by iosignalfd.  But if that is
what everyone wants, I guess I have no choice.

>
>> One is enough :)
>> Seriously, do you see that this saves you all of RCU, linked lists and
>> counters? You don't need to keep track of iofds, you don't need to
>> implement your own lookup logic - you just use the kvm device
>> and that's it.
>>
>>    
>
> Yup.
>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 266 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-23 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-19  0:30 [KVM PATCH v8 0/3] iosignalfd Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19  0:30 ` [KVM PATCH v8 1/3] KVM: make io_bus interface more robust Gregory Haskins
2009-06-25 14:22   ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-25 14:53     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-25 14:56       ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19  0:30 ` [KVM PATCH v8 2/3] KVM: add per-vm limit on the maximum number of io-devices supported Gregory Haskins
2009-06-19  0:30 ` [KVM PATCH v8 3/3] KVM: add iosignalfd support Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 10:44   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 12:13     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 12:26       ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-06-22 12:30       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 12:56         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 13:08           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 13:12             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 13:13             ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 13:04         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 13:13           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 13:19             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 14:30               ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 14:39                 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 14:28             ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-22 15:16   ` [PATCH RFC] pass write value to in_range pointers Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 15:45     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 16:08       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-22 16:29         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-22 17:27           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23  4:04             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 11:44               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 11:52                 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 11:56                 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 12:01                   ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 12:19                     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 11:53               ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23  9:54           ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23  9:52         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 11:41           ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2009-06-23 11:46             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23  8:56   ` [KVM PATCH v8 3/3] KVM: add iosignalfd support Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23  9:57     ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 10:48       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 11:24         ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 11:33     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 11:36       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-23 11:40         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-06-23 13:22     ` Gregory Haskins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A40BF58.8060603@novell.com \
    --to=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markmc@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox