From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] introduce -cpu host target Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:54:52 +0300 Message-ID: <4A41F7EC.2000305@redhat.com> References: <1245707277-769-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Andre Przywara Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:37853 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752196AbZFXJxz (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:53:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1245707277-769-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@amd.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/23/2009 12:47 AM, Andre Przywara wrote: > Should we ignore unhandled MSRs like QEMU or Xen do? > Ignoring unhandled msrs is dangerous. If a write has some effect the guest depends on, and we're not emulating that effect, the guest will fail. Similarly if you don't know what a register mean, who knows what returning zero for a read will do. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function