From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Haskins Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass value to in_range callback Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:25:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4A43CF18.9020908@gmail.com> References: <20090625125333.GB7166@redhat.com> <4A438E8F.4080008@gmail.com> <20090625192329.GB3239@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC2EAB0110F7AFC7CAF5E8D53" Cc: Gregory Haskins , avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, markmc@redhat.com To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com ([209.85.219.210]:41023 "EHLO mail-ew0-f210.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752656AbZFYTZP (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:25:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090625192329.GB3239@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC2EAB0110F7AFC7CAF5E8D53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:49:51AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > =20 >> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> =20 >>> For write transactions, pass the value written to in_range checks so >>> that we can make each iosignalfd a separate device on kvm bus. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin >>> --- >>> >>> Reposting with a subject now. Sorry. >>> >>> Avi, can you please merge this patch in kvm.git so that >>> Gregory can use it for iosignalfd? Once bus has RCU >>> we'll be able to remove in_range completely, but >>> let's do it step by step. >>> =20 >>> =20 >> I think this patch will just make more churn for me, not less. You ha= ve >> now convinced me that your io_range-less approach is better. ;) >> >> Lets just fix the RCU thing and do it right. Patch is under developme= nt >> as we speak. >> >> -Greg >> =20 > > So - let's go ahead with this one? > > =20 Whatever you think is best and/or gets us to the end goal the fastest ;) -Greg --------------enigC2EAB0110F7AFC7CAF5E8D53 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpDzxgACgkQP5K2CMvXmqEBLACfaIjzd+R9D3gaUDX9xczYLxrk LX0An3Nzt8mt2p6P/IkbN9Up73YxcJ89 =irpY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC2EAB0110F7AFC7CAF5E8D53--