From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH] Adding iperf test Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:14:42 +0300 Message-ID: <4A4B9982.4090909@redhat.com> References: <1245187799-7757-1-git-send-email-lmr@redhat.com> <7fac565a0907010443pb06a5chc6ee789cc31d6c25@mail.gmail.com> <1246463836.14963.10.camel@freedom> <33307c790907010918n36d78ea5r55c53d1639e6eb3f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues , Alexey Eremenko , autotest@test.kernel.org, Alexey Eromenko , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Bligh Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:55492 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752777AbZGARNB (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:13:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <33307c790907010918n36d78ea5r55c53d1639e6eb3f@mail.gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/01/2009 07:18 PM, Martin Bligh wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > >> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 14:43 +0300, Alexey Eremenko wrote: >> >>> LMR: me too, hate putting binaries in source tree, but the alternative >>> option is to provide separate *.tar.bz2 for all the binary utils, and >>> I don't sure which way is better. >>> >> Yes, I don't have a clear idea as well. It's currently under >> discussion... >> > > Is KVM x86_64 only? > It's x86-64, i386, ia64, s390, and powerpc 44x/e500 only. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function