From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v8 1/3] KVM: Fix races in irqfd using new eventfd_kref_get interface Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:42:10 +0300 Message-ID: <4A4CC742.9020400@redhat.com> References: <20090701160208.3615.99153.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090701160902.3615.39426.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <4A4CC14C.1000905@redhat.com> <4A4CC3B4.7060109@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, davidel@xmailserver.org To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:34880 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753217AbZGBOkQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:40:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A4CC3B4.7060109@novell.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/02/2009 05:27 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > >> Please split the eventfd.c hunk into a separate patch. When preparing >> the 2.6.32 submission, I'll fold that into the patch into its >> antipatch and they'll disappear. >> >> > Ok, but note that that means I should probably split 1/3 back out into > 1/5 (prepare), 2/5 (eventfd hunk), 3/5 (fix irqfd) again like I had in > v7 so that the series is bisectable. Is that ok? > > Sure. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function