From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v9 0/5] irqfd fixes and enhancements Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:42:59 +0300 Message-ID: <4A5083B3.7010307@redhat.com> References: <20090702153454.20186.99191.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <4A4CD729.6050300@redhat.com> <4A50723E.6030305@redhat.com> <20090705103857.GA3923@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gregory Haskins , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidel@xmailserver.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:40180 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752302AbZGEKkp (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:40:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090705103857.GA3923@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/05/2009 01:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> ... and unapplied. There's a refcounting mismatch in irqfd_cleanup: a >> reference is taken for each irqfd, but dropped for each guest. This >> causes an oops if a guest with no irqfds is created and destroyed: >> > > Avi, I verified and it seems that reverting just the last patch > in series should be enough. Comments? > I'll reapply the first N-1 patches. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function