From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v9 5/5] KVM: create irqfd-cleanup-wq on demand Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:17:20 +0300 Message-ID: <4A52DA60.8040200@redhat.com> References: <20090702153454.20186.99191.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090702153821.20186.9344.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090706155850.GA12399@redhat.com> <4A522050.7030200@novell.com> <20090706161444.GC12399@redhat.com> <4A52272A.2060101@novell.com> <20090706165045.GF12399@redhat.com> <4A524243.9020100@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidel@xmailserver.org To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53067 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751056AbZGGFRG (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:17:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A524243.9020100@novell.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/06/2009 09:28 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote: > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 12:32:42PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: >> >> >>> For the record, I would have rather just used my originally proposed >>> slow-work thread instead of all this ;) >>> >>> >> Or just keep the idle thread around, it's not a big deal. >> >> >> > > If everyone is fine with that, lets do that then. It's certainly the > simplest solution to just drop this patch. > > Avi? > > Sure. If someone complains we can address it then. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.