From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Wolf Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:12:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4A577685.30103@redhat.com> References: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> <1247128021.22231.1.camel@blaa> <4A55F150.3020803@codemonkey.ws> <87eisp1gx2.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> <4A5747E4.3030101@us.ibm.com> <4A57586B.9050900@siemens.com> <4A576317.6010000@us.ibm.com> <4A577291.4000206@redhat.com> <4A57736D.6040708@codemonkey.ws> <20090710171019.GA5014@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , kvm-devel To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:40771 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751055AbZGJRNx (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:13:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090710171019.GA5014@lst.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christoph Hellwig schrieb: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:59:25AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> If I'm not mistaken, the patch "qemu-io: Implement >>> bdrv_get_buffer/bdrv_put_buffer" is missing from the queue. >>> >> I just did a pull a few hours ago from Christoph's qemu-io tree. I'm >> expecting qemu-io patches to go through his tree. > > I hold that patch back for now as it will need a bit of work if > the ->bdrv_{get,put}_buffer renaming patch goes in. Ok, that makes sense. Will you take care of it once the renaming patch is in or should I resend it then? Kevin