From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:58:12 -0500
Message-ID: <4A578134.3020901@codemonkey.ws>
References: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> <4A5771C3.7050103@siemens.com> <4A577465.1050104@us.ibm.com> <200907101840.55859.paul@codesourcery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.26]:56144 "EHLO
	qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750991AbZGJR6R (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:58:17 -0400
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so386496qwb.37
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200907101840.55859.paul@codesourcery.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Paul Brook wrote:
>> Right, that part I'm okay with.  But the vCont based gdb model presumes
>> a unified address space which while usually true for kernel address
>> spaces, isn't universally true and certainly not true when PC is in
>> userspace.  That's what I understood to be the major objection to vCont.
>>     
>
> The thread bits are the wrong way to do things, but are probably relatively 
> harmless for now. Expect me to remove them at the first available opportunity.
>   

I'll queue 1-3 then and we'll leave 4 for post-0.11 debate.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori