kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] change order of kvm_init call.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:10:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A6DED90.3010200@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090727180003.GE4776@poweredge.glommer>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2232 bytes --]

Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:49:06PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Glauber Costa wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:59:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>> The goal is to get rid of the call to kvm_init. But those things
>>>>> are subtle, and often break. So do it in a separate patch, to help
>>>>> finding potential issues in future bisections.
>>>>>       
>>>> Found such an issued: This patch triggers a segfault if no kvm modules
>>>> are loaded and you start qemu without -no-kvm. Please have a look.
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>     
>>> ok, the culprit seems to be a 
>>>
>>>     if (kvm_enabled())
>>>         return;
>>>
>>> in the beginning of code_gen_alloc.
>>>
>>> It is 7f3d0cbe, by Avi, and according to changelog, suggested by anthony.
>>> I however, fail to realise the purpose of this optimization. For one thing,
>>> it totally dictates that kvm has absolutely to be enabled or disabled prior
>>> to this point. No mind changing later. Also, the real deal is to be able
>>> to compile out tcg entirely. The strategy of just disabling the code gen
>>> alloc is a minor nitpick that just papers over this.
>>>   
>> I agree with you in principle but I think reverting this papers over an  
>> issue.
>>
>> Why are we touching code_gen_ptr when using KVM?  Can someone post the  
>> full back trace?
> we're not.
> 
> The issue happens exactly when the kvm modules are not loaded, then we're failing
> to initialize kvm. However, in the patch that raised this issue, I'm moving
> KVM initialization to after this code path. And in qemu-kvm.git, kvm is
> enabled-by-default. So tcg code would think kvm is enabled and skip initialization,
> while kvm code will fail to really initialize itself later.
> 
> Result? Mayhem.
> 

I think we should simply resolves this the way upstream does: Do not
start if modules are missing and -no-kvm is omitted - or even switch
over to -enable-kvm as I think you already suggested in some other
thread. Then we can either fail or succeed, but not fall back more or
less silently. This falling back of qemu-kvm to tcg is a constant source
of confusion anyway.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-27 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-20 23:10 [PATCH 0/9] More integration with qemu.git Glauber Costa
2009-07-20 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/9] require --enable-kvm Glauber Costa
2009-07-20 23:10   ` [PATCH 2/9] embed kvm_create_context into kvm_init Glauber Costa
2009-07-20 23:10     ` [PATCH 3/9] change order of kvm_init call Glauber Costa
2009-07-20 23:10       ` [PATCH 4/9] use qemu version of kvm initialization Glauber Costa
2009-07-20 23:10         ` [PATCH 5/9] fold second pass " Glauber Costa
2009-07-20 23:10           ` [PATCH 6/9] remove kvm_in* functions Glauber Costa
2009-07-20 23:10             ` [PATCH 7/9] reuse env stop and stopped states Glauber Costa
2009-07-20 23:10               ` [PATCH 8/9] kvm_send_ipi Glauber Costa
2009-07-20 23:10                 ` [PATCH 9/9] remove kvm_abi variable Glauber Costa
2009-07-21  6:11             ` [PATCH 6/9] remove kvm_in* functions Gleb Natapov
2009-07-21 12:23               ` Glauber Costa
2009-07-21 12:18                 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-26 18:59       ` [PATCH 3/9] change order of kvm_init call Jan Kiszka
2009-07-27 17:38         ` Glauber Costa
2009-07-27 17:49           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-27 18:00             ` Glauber Costa
2009-07-27 18:10               ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2009-07-27 18:20                 ` Glauber Costa
2009-07-27 18:28                   ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-07-27 18:38                     ` Glauber Costa
2009-07-27 18:44                       ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-07-27 19:55                         ` Glauber Costa
2009-07-27 18:34               ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A6DED90.3010200@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).