From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] exit if we fail to initialize kvm Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:49:59 +0300 Message-ID: <4A703767.6050301@redhat.com> References: <1248814374-7953-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <20090728212852.GY4776@poweredge.glommer> <4A7021AC.80403@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Graf , Glauber Costa , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:55552 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754211AbZG2LpX (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:45:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A7021AC.80403@siemens.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/29/2009 01:17 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > I just wonder now if/when qemu-kvm will switch over to the > kvm-by-default-off policy of upstream? > That will surely inconvenience/surprise a lot of users. A migration path could be: - add -accel - start warning when -accel is not used, encouraging people to use -accel - time passes - switch default to tcg (maybe unless invoked with kvm in argv[0]) - time passes - remove warning -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function