From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] kvm/svm: handle #pf intercepts in nested_svm_exit_handled directly Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:49:12 +0300 Message-ID: <4A706168.2090804@redhat.com> References: <1248872192-30881-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1248872192-30881-12-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <4A705AB4.90103@suse.de> <4A706035.9020502@redhat.com> <4A705F7F.3030507@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:56827 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753721AbZG2Oof (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:44:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A705F7F.3030507@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/29/2009 05:41 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> Me too. Why ack then? >> > > Because the patch is fine. It's just the description that's missing. > Shouldn't I ack when the only thing I don't like is the description? > The description is part of the patch, an important one. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function