kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: davidel@xmailserver.org, gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC 2/2] eventfd: EFD_STATE flag
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:09:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A76FDB2.7080706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090728175538.GC21549@redhat.com>

On 07/28/2009 08:55 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> This implements a new EFD_STATE flag for eventfd.
> When set, this flag changes eventfd behaviour in the following way:
> - write simply stores the value written, and is always non-blocking
> - read unblocks when the value written changes, and
>    returns the value written
>
> Motivation: we'd like to use eventfd in qemu to pass interrupts from
> (emulated or assigned) devices to guest. For level interrupts, the
> counter supported currently by eventfd is not a good match: we really
> need to set interrupt to a level, typically 0 or 1, and give the guest
> ability to see the last value written.
>
>
> @@ -31,37 +31,59 @@ struct eventfd_ctx {
>   	 * issue a wakeup.
>   	 */
>   	__u64 count;
> +	/*
> +	 * When EF_STATE flag is set, eventfd behaves differently:
> +	 * value written gets stored in "count", read will copy
> +	 * "count" to "state".
> +	 */
> +	__u64 state;
>   	unsigned int flags;
>   };
>    

Why not write the new value into ->count directly?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-03 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1248803500.git.mst@redhat.com>
2009-07-28 17:54 ` [PATCH-RFC 1/2] eventfd: reorganize the code to simplify new flags Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-07-28 17:55 ` [PATCH-RFC 2/2] eventfd: EFD_STATE flag Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-08-03 15:09   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-08-03 15:14     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-08-03 15:29       ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-03 16:57         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-08-04  8:53           ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-04  8:54             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-08-04  9:17               ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-04  9:17                 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-08-04  9:25                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-04  9:23                     ` Gleb Natapov
2009-08-04  9:30                       ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-04  9:26                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-08-04 10:06                           ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-04  9:33                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A76FDB2.7080706@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).