public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Always use KVM_VERSION to build version number
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:58:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7E9DA9.3060204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A7C1E96.3060200@redhat.com>

On 08/07/2009 03:31 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> Avi,
>       Trying to use libvirt with development snapshots of qemu-kvm is a bit
> problematic.  The trouble is that for all development snapshots, the value that
> gets placed into this string:
>
> QEMU PC emulator version 0.10.0 (kvm-devel), Copyright (c) 2003-2008
>
> Is always kvm-devel.  That means we can't tell if this is a kvm development
> snapshot built yesterday, or 6 months ago, which means that in turn we can't
> tell what features are available.  While we can always tell people building
> their own qemu to force it by echoing a value into KVM_VERSION, it would be much
> better if this were done by default.  Something like kvm-88-devel, which would
> signify that this the development happening after kvm-88, leading towards
> kvm-89.  Would you accept something like the patch below, which would require
> you to edit the KVM_VERSION file twice during a release (once right before the
> release, to change it to kvm-89, and once right after the release to change it
> back to kvm-89-devel)?
>
>    

This is problematic in two ways.  One is that I am basically guaranteed 
to forget to edit the file (which is why the release scripts generate 
the name based on the tag).

On fix is to use git describe --match to find out what's the closest 
release.  But this is still quite bad as it doesn't account for branches 
and forks.

How about adding 'qemu -describe-features' which will output, one line 
per feature, what's supported (and limits where applicable)?  I 
understand libvirt already does this for some features using -help; this 
is simply a formalization of that hack.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-09  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-07 12:31 [PATCH]: Always use KVM_VERSION to build version number Chris Lalancette
2009-08-09  9:58 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-08-10  9:19   ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-08-10  9:39     ` [PATCH] configure: make default KVM_VERSION qemu-kvm-devel Mark McLoughlin
2009-08-10  9:47       ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-10  9:46     ` [PATCH]: Always use KVM_VERSION to build version number Avi Kivity
2009-08-10  9:52       ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-08-10 10:12         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A7E9DA9.3060204@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=clalance@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox