From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Always use KVM_VERSION to build version number Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:12:09 +0300 Message-ID: <4A7FF279.5060409@redhat.com> References: <4A7C1E96.3060200@redhat.com> <4A7E9DA9.3060204@redhat.com> <1249895994.8784.47.camel@blaa> <4A7FEC7F.9070304@redhat.com> <1249897932.8784.71.camel@blaa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Lalancette , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Mark McLoughlin Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:50005 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753563AbZHJKGG (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:06:06 -0400 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7AA67Q5013765 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:06:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1249897932.8784.71.camel@blaa> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/10/2009 12:52 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:46 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 08/10/2009 12:19 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: >> >>> Or we could drop this kvm snapshot numbering system and just use qemu >>> VERSION numbering - i.e. qemu-kvm-devel-88 could have been published as >>> qemu-kvm-0.10.50 >>> >>> >> Yeah. You still couldn't distinguish among different snapshots. >> > > 0.10.51, 0.10.52 etc. > The "50" is owned by upstream, so 0.10.50.1. >> Logically it needs to work before starting a VM, so a command line >> option is more appropriate. >> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-11/msg00899.html > http://implement.it.already -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function