From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@Voltaire.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/2] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:16:47 +0300
Message-ID: <4A8BB4EF.7030403@Voltaire.com>
References: <20090813182749.GA6585@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from fwil.voltaire.com ([193.47.165.2]:28413 "EHLO exil.voltaire.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751795AbZHSIQs (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:16:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090813182749.GA6585@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> The patches are against 2.6.31-rc4.  I'd like them to go into linux-next
> and down the road 2.6.32 if possible.  Please comment.

Hi Michael,

Just wanted to make sure with you how this can be tested, is 2.6.31-rc4 
plus these two patches enough to form the kernel part? I wasn't sure if
both the irqfd/iosignalfd are needed and if both are merged to Linus tree...

As for the user space part, should I use upstream qemu plus patches 1-4?

Or.