From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [RFC] Nested VMX support - kernel Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:55:47 +0300 Message-ID: <4A8EC383.3090302@redhat.com> References: <1250516916-19493-1-git-send-email-oritw@il.ibm.com> <4A8A7875.7080400@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Abel Gordon , agraf@suse.de, aliguori@us.ibm.com, Ben-Ami Yassour1 , joerg.roedel@amd.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mdday@us.ibm.com, Muli Ben-Yehuda To: Orit Wasserman Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59586 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932265AbZHUPzb (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:55:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/19/2009 05:18 PM, Orit Wasserman wrote: >> Why remove the check? It's still needed (presuming root_gfn refers to >> the guest eptp). >> > Here the root_gfn refers to the L2 guest CR3, which L0 can't check for > validity. > Ok. There must be a similar check for GUEST_CR3 or EPT_POINTER. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.