From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Lechner <cl0059@l-mx.de>
Subject: Re: kvm-88: KVM_APIC_READ: read reserved register b0
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:42:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4A9A6596.3010302@l-mx.de>
References: <4A97AB92.9090509@l-mx.de> <20090829212036.GA3014@defiant.freesoftware.org> <4A9A4D7F.3010904@l-mx.de> <20090830100159.GT30093@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dbareiro@gmx.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from denver136.server4free.de ([217.172.178.136]:38283 "EHLO
	denver136.server4free.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753302AbZH3LmZ (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:42:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090830100159.GT30093@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Gleb Natapov wrote:
> This printk no longer exists in upstream kvm.
> 

just to be curious: What was the reason to add that debugging message?

I don't know much about the background of the message, but I assume that
it is useful. So wouldn't it be a idea to keep the code for the message
where it is and just throttle the rate it is reported?

- cl