From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Running kvm/use/kvmctl just segfault Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:12:48 +0300 Message-ID: <4AADD0D0.3090403@redhat.com> References: <958448fc0909130138mc51025el82baeaed545f18c8@mail.gmail.com> <4AACC85E.7010009@redhat.com> <958448fc0909131838m7b6a2ab9heba226feb08c1cd4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm To: shawn du Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50046 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751239AbZINFMy (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:12:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <958448fc0909131838m7b6a2ab9heba226feb08c1cd4@mail.gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/14/2009 04:38 AM, shawn du wrote: > Are these commands right? > > ./kvmctl -s 1 -m 256 test/x86/smptest.flat > or ./kvmctl -s 1 -m 128 text/x86/bootstrap test/x86/smptest.flat > > That is the correct way. However I haven't tested the smp tests in a while (probably since kvm gained smp support), they're probably completely bitrotted. I am now in the process of eliminating kvmctl and running the tests through qemu. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.