From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] core, x86: Add user return notifiers Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:48:49 +0300 Message-ID: <4AB89D81.5080808@redhat.com> References: <4AB3CDEC.5050902@zytor.com> <1253342422-13811-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4AB8980D.5070803@redhat.com> <20090922113708.65f655f6@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti To: Arjan van de Ven Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41502 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755195AbZIVJtD (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:49:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090922113708.65f655f6@infradead.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/22/2009 12:37 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:25:33 +0300 > Avi Kivity wrote: > > >> On 09/19/2009 09:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> >>> Add a general per-cpu notifier that is called whenever the kernel is >>> about to return to userspace. The notifier uses a thread_info flag >>> and existing checks, so there is no impact on user return or context >>> switch fast paths. >>> >>> >> Ingo/Peter? >> > isn't this like really expensive when used ? > No, why? It triggers a call to do_notify_resume() and a walks a list of length 1. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function