kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: Release plan for 0.12.0
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:18:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC2BFFF.7070407@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9c105ea0909291720o7f585aabm880b7eb32eab9d83@mail.gmail.com>

Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>   
>> Now that 0.11.0 is behind us, it's time to start thinking about 0.12.0.
>>
>> I'd like to do a few things different this time around.  I don't think the
>> -rc process went very well as I don't think we got more testing out of it.
>>  I'd like to shorten the timeline for 0.12.0 a good bit.  The 0.10 stable
>> tree got pretty difficult to maintain toward the end of the cycle.  We also
>> had a pretty huge amount of change between 0.10 and 0.11 so I think a
>> shorter cycle is warranted.
>>
>> I think aiming for early to mid-December would give us roughly a 3 month
>> cycle and would align well with some of the Linux distribution cycles.  I'd
>> like to limit things to a single -rc that lasted only for about a week.
>>  This is enough time to fix most of the obvious issues I think.
>>     
>
> As a downstream packager of qemu-kvm, I thought I'd mention that the
> next Ubuntu cycle is now public:
>  * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidReleaseSchedule
>
> The key date here is Feature Freeze, which is February 25, 2010.
> That's the point by which we'd need to have a new qemu-kvm (which of
> course is downstream of qemu) package in Ubuntu for the LTS 10.04
> release in April 2010.
>   

If we did a December release, then the 0.13 release would probably be in 
the April time frame.  Not really ideal for Lucid so I'd recommend that 
you ship 0.12.  The good news would be that 0.12 should be very stable 
by Feb 25th and since Lucid is an LTS, that's probably a Good Thing.

-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-30  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-29 23:54 Release plan for 0.12.0 Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30  0:20 ` Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-30  2:18   ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-09-30  2:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Isaku Yamahata
2009-09-30 13:03   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 13:43     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-30  5:17 ` Amit Shah
2009-09-30 13:04   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 13:37     ` Amit Shah
2009-09-30 14:47       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 14:50         ` Amit Shah
2009-09-30  6:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2009-09-30 13:05   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-01 21:13     ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-10-03 10:04       ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-05 12:43         ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-10-05 13:52           ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-30 13:31   ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-30  8:53 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-09-30  9:01   ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-30  9:31 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-09-30 13:07   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 15:59     ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-09-30 19:25       ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-30 13:30 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-30 14:45   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 15:03     ` Fred Leeflang
2009-09-30 15:26       ` [Qemu-devel] " Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-30 17:03     ` Juan Quintela
2009-09-30 19:28     ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2009-10-03  4:28 ` TAKEDA, toshiya
2009-10-08 13:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jens Osterkamp
2009-10-08 14:21   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-14 13:09     ` [Qemu-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-10-14 13:53       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-14 14:01         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 14:04       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 13:21     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 14:17       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-14 14:24         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 15:19           ` [Qemu-devel] " Jamie Lokier
2009-10-14 15:50             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 21:10               ` [Qemu-devel] " Sridhar Samudrala
2009-10-14 22:53                 ` Raw vs. tap (was: Re: Re: Release plan for 0.12.0) Anthony Liguori
2009-10-15  6:36                   ` Raw vs. tap (was: Re: [Qemu-devel] " Mark McLoughlin
2009-10-15  7:56                   ` Raw vs. tap (was: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-15 13:32                     ` Raw vs. tap Anthony Liguori
2009-10-15 15:04                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-15 15:18                         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-15 15:48                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-15 18:37                             ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-15 22:08                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-18 10:05                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-15  7:51                 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Release plan for 0.12.0 Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-20  6:33 ` Takahiro Hirofuchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AC2BFFF.7070407@us.ibm.com \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kirkland@canonical.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).