From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Release plan for 0.12.0
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:28:38 +0200
Message-ID: <4AC3B166.8030401@redhat.com>
References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com> <20090930103001.21aa7a8d@doriath> <4AC36F0C.8020400@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
	Andrzej Zaborowski <balrogg@gmail.com>,
	"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
	Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39680 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753240AbZI3T3L (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:29:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4AC36F0C.8020400@us.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 09/30/09 16:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> One reason I branch is because some people care a bit less about
> releases so it makes the process non-disruptive to them. If the other
> maintainers agreed though, I would certainly like to have the master
> branch essentially frozen for the week before the release.

We had much longer disruptions without a release freeze, so why worry 
about a single week?  One week freeze is short enougth that the 
disruption isn't a big issue.  It will help testing the to-be-released 
code.  Go for it.

cheers,
   Gerd