From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] core, x86: Add user return notifiers Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:30:50 +0200 Message-ID: <4AC4CB2A.4000908@redhat.com> References: <4AB3CDEC.5050902@zytor.com> <1253342422-13811-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4AB8980D.5070803@redhat.com> <20090922143223.GA31702@elte.hu> <4AB8EAF2.1030204@zytor.com> <4AC4C8F2.5050708@redhat.com> <4AC4C9D5.3000902@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti To: "H. Peter Anvin" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49119 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752995AbZJAPbF (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:31:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AC4C9D5.3000902@zytor.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/01/2009 05:25 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 10/01/2009 08:21 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Re-ping? >> >> If accepted, please merge just the core patch and I will carry all of >> them in parallel. Once tip is merged I'll drop my copy of the first patch. >> >> > I was just talking to Ingo about this... would you consider this .32 or > .33 material at his time? It came in awfully late for .32... > While I'd prefer it to be in .32, as there's much churn in both trees, I guess we should follow the process and schedule it for .33. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.