From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Kevin Bowling <kevinb@analograils.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: INFO: task journal:337 blocked for more than 120 seconds
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:30:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC646D7.5030709@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1254345112.8837.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On 09/30/09 14:11, Shirley Ma wrote:
> Anybody found this problem before? I kept hitting this issue for 2.6.31
> guest kernel even with a simple network test.
>
> INFO: task kjournal:337 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_sec" disables this message.
>
> kjournald D 00000041 0 337 2 0x00000000
>
> My test is totally being blocked.
I'm assuming from the lists you've posted to that this is under KVM?
What disk drivers are you using (virtio or emulated)?
Can you get a full stack backtrace of kjournald?
Kevin Bowling submitted a RH bug against Xen with apparently the same
symptoms (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526627). I'm
wondering if there's a core kernel bug here, which is perhaps more
easily triggered by the changed timing in a virtual machine.
Thanks,
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 21:11 INFO: task journal:337 blocked for more than 120 seconds Shirley Ma
2009-10-01 13:20 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-10-01 16:58 ` Shirley Ma
2009-10-01 21:00 ` INFO: task kjournal:337 " Shirley Ma
2009-10-01 21:03 ` Javier Guerra
2009-10-01 21:17 ` Shirley Ma
2009-10-01 22:09 ` Shirley Ma
2009-10-02 18:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-10-02 19:06 ` INFO: task journal:337 " Shirley Ma
2009-10-02 19:13 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-04 4:12 ` Kevin Bowling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AC646D7.5030709@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=kevinb@analograils.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mashirle@us.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).