From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: Release plan for 0.12.0 Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:21:04 -0500 Message-ID: <4ACDF550.1020502@codemonkey.ws> References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com> <200910081555.40897.jens@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel , Paul Brook To: Jens Osterkamp Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200910081555.40897.jens@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Jens Osterkamp wrote: > On Wednesday 30 September 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> o VMState conversion -- I expect most of the pc target to be completed >> o qdev conversion -- I hope that we'll get most of the pc target >> completely converted to qdev >> o storage live migration >> o switch to SeaBIOS (need to finish porting features from Bochs) >> o switch to gPXE (need to resolve slirp tftp server issue) >> o KSM integration >> o in-kernel APIC support for KVM >> o guest SMP support for KVM >> o updates to the default pc machine type >> >> Please add to this list and I'll collect it all and post it somewhere. >> > > What about Or Gerlitz' raw backend driver ? I did not see it go in yet, or did > I miss something ? > The patch seems to have not been updated after the initial posting and the first feedback cycle. I'm generally inclined to oppose the functionality as I don't think it offers any advantages over the existing backends. Regards, Anthony Liguori