From: "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@intel.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] KVM:VMX: Add support for Pause-Loop Exiting
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:03:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACF0A68.6040906@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091002182840.GA6533@amt.cnet>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4416 bytes --]
Tosatti,
See attached patch.
Avi,
Could you pls. do the check in if no any other comments.
Thanks,
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:22:49PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:01:51AM +0800, Zhai, Edwin wrote:
>>
>>> Avi,
>>> I modify it according your comments. The only thing I want to keep is
>>> the module param ple_gap/window. Although they are not per-guest, they
>>> can be used to find the right value, and disable PLE for debug purpose.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/28/2009 11:33 AM, Zhai, Edwin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +#define KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_GAP 41
>>>>>> +#define KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_WINDOW 4096
>>>>>> +static int __read_mostly ple_gap = KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_GAP;
>>>>>> +module_param(ple_gap, int, S_IRUGO);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static int __read_mostly ple_window = KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_WINDOW;
>>>>>> +module_param(ple_window, int, S_IRUGO);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shouldn't be __read_mostly since they're read very rarely
>>>>>> (__read_mostly should be for variables that are very often read,
>>>>>> and rarely written).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> In general, they are read only except that experienced user may try
>>>>> different parameter for perf tuning.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> __read_mostly doesn't just mean it's read mostly. It also means it's
>>>> read often. Otherwise it's just wasting space in hot cachelines.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not even sure they should be parameters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> For different spinlock in different OS, and for different workloads,
>>>>> we need different parameter for tuning. It's similar as the
>>>>> enable_ept.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> No, global parameters don't work for tuning workloads and guests since
>>>> they cannot be modified on a per-guest basis. enable_ept is only
>>>> useful for debugging and testing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>>>>>>> + schedule_hrtimeout(&expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please add a tracepoint for this (since it can cause significant
>>>>>> change in behaviour),
>>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't trace_kvm_exit(exit_reason, ...) enough? We can tell the PLE
>>>>> vmexit from other vmexits.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Right. I thought of the software spinlock detector, but that's another
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>> I think you can drop the sleep_time parameter, it can be part of the
>>>> function. Also kvm_vcpu_sleep() is confusing, we also sleep on halt.
>>>> Please call it kvm_vcpu_on_spin() or something (since that's what the
>>>> guest is doing).
>>>>
>> kvm_vcpu_on_spin() should add the vcpu to vcpu->wq (so a new pending
>> interrupt wakes it up immediately).
>>
>
> Updated version (also please send it separately from the vmx.c patch):
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 894a56e..43125dc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ int kvm_is_visible_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn);
> void mark_page_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn);
>
> void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_resched(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_load_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 4d0dd39..e788d70 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1479,6 +1479,21 @@ void kvm_resched(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_resched);
>
> +void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + ktime_t expires;
> + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> + prepare_to_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +
> + /* Sleep for 100 us, and hope lock-holder got scheduled */
> + expires = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), 100000UL);
> + schedule_hrtimeout(&expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
> +
> + finish_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_on_spin);
> +
> static int kvm_vcpu_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = vma->vm_file->private_data;
>
>
--
best rgds,
edwin
[-- Attachment #2: kvm_ple_hrtimer_1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6213 bytes --]
KVM:VMX: Add support for Pause-Loop Exiting
New NHM processors will support Pause-Loop Exiting by adding 2 VM-execution
control fields:
PLE_Gap - upper bound on the amount of time between two successive
executions of PAUSE in a loop.
PLE_Window - upper bound on the amount of time a guest is allowed to execute in
a PAUSE loop
If the time, between this execution of PAUSE and previous one, exceeds the
PLE_Gap, processor consider this PAUSE belongs to a new loop.
Otherwise, processor determins the the total execution time of this loop(since
1st PAUSE in this loop), and triggers a VM exit if total time exceeds the
PLE_Window.
* Refer SDM volume 3b section 21.6.13 & 22.1.3.
Pause-Loop Exiting can be used to detect Lock-Holder Preemption, where one VP
is sched-out after hold a spinlock, then other VPs for same lock are sched-in
to waste the CPU time.
Our tests indicate that most spinlocks are held for less than 212 cycles.
Performance tests show that with 2X LP over-commitment we can get +2% perf
improvement for kernel build(Even more perf gain with more LPs).
Signed-off-by: Zhai Edwin <edwin.zhai@intel.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
index 272514c..2b49454 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
#define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VPID 0x00000020
#define SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING 0x00000040
#define SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST 0x00000080
+#define SECONDARY_EXEC_PAUSE_LOOP_EXITING 0x00000400
#define PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK 0x00000001
@@ -144,6 +145,8 @@ enum vmcs_field {
VM_ENTRY_INSTRUCTION_LEN = 0x0000401a,
TPR_THRESHOLD = 0x0000401c,
SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL = 0x0000401e,
+ PLE_GAP = 0x00004020,
+ PLE_WINDOW = 0x00004022,
VM_INSTRUCTION_ERROR = 0x00004400,
VM_EXIT_REASON = 0x00004402,
VM_EXIT_INTR_INFO = 0x00004404,
@@ -248,6 +251,7 @@ enum vmcs_field {
#define EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ 31
#define EXIT_REASON_MSR_WRITE 32
#define EXIT_REASON_MWAIT_INSTRUCTION 36
+#define EXIT_REASON_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION 40
#define EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY 41
#define EXIT_REASON_TPR_BELOW_THRESHOLD 43
#define EXIT_REASON_APIC_ACCESS 44
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 70020e5..93274c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -61,6 +61,25 @@ module_param_named(unrestricted_guest,
static int __read_mostly emulate_invalid_guest_state = 0;
module_param(emulate_invalid_guest_state, bool, S_IRUGO);
+/*
+ * These 2 parameters are used to config the controls for Pause-Loop Exiting:
+ * ple_gap: upper bound on the amount of time between two successive
+ * executions of PAUSE in a loop. Also indicate if ple enabled.
+ * According to test, this time is usually small than 41 cycles.
+ * ple_window: upper bound on the amount of time a guest is allowed to execute
+ * in a PAUSE loop. Tests indicate that most spinlocks are held for
+ * less than 2^12 cycles
+ * Time is measured based on a counter that runs at the same rate as the TSC,
+ * refer SDM volume 3b section 21.6.13 & 22.1.3.
+ */
+#define KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_GAP 41
+#define KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_WINDOW 4096
+static int ple_gap = KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_GAP;
+module_param(ple_gap, int, S_IRUGO);
+
+static int ple_window = KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_WINDOW;
+module_param(ple_window, int, S_IRUGO);
+
struct vmcs {
u32 revision_id;
u32 abort;
@@ -319,6 +338,12 @@ static inline int cpu_has_vmx_unrestricted_guest(void)
SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST;
}
+static inline int cpu_has_vmx_ple(void)
+{
+ return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
+ SECONDARY_EXEC_PAUSE_LOOP_EXITING;
+}
+
static inline int vm_need_virtualize_apic_accesses(struct kvm *kvm)
{
return flexpriority_enabled &&
@@ -1240,7 +1265,8 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf)
SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING |
SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VPID |
SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_EPT |
- SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST;
+ SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST |
+ SECONDARY_EXEC_PAUSE_LOOP_EXITING;
if (adjust_vmx_controls(min2, opt2,
MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2,
&_cpu_based_2nd_exec_control) < 0)
@@ -1386,6 +1412,9 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
if (enable_ept && !cpu_has_vmx_ept_2m_page())
kvm_disable_largepages();
+ if (!cpu_has_vmx_ple())
+ ple_gap = 0;
+
return alloc_kvm_area();
}
@@ -2298,9 +2327,16 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_EPT;
if (!enable_unrestricted_guest)
exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST;
+ if (!ple_gap)
+ exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_PAUSE_LOOP_EXITING;
vmcs_write32(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, exec_control);
}
+ if (ple_gap) {
+ vmcs_write32(PLE_GAP, ple_gap);
+ vmcs_write32(PLE_WINDOW, ple_window);
+ }
+
vmcs_write32(PAGE_FAULT_ERROR_CODE_MASK, !!bypass_guest_pf);
vmcs_write32(PAGE_FAULT_ERROR_CODE_MATCH, !!bypass_guest_pf);
vmcs_write32(CR3_TARGET_COUNT, 0); /* 22.2.1 */
@@ -3348,6 +3384,19 @@ out:
}
/*
+ * Indicate a busy-waiting vcpu in spinlock. We do not enable the PAUSE
+ * exiting, so only get here on cpu with PAUSE-Loop-Exiting.
+ */
+static int handle_pause(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+{
+ skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
+ kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/*
* The exit handlers return 1 if the exit was handled fully and guest execution
* may resume. Otherwise they set the kvm_run parameter to indicate what needs
* to be done to userspace and return 0.
@@ -3383,6 +3432,7 @@ static int (*kvm_vmx_exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) = {
[EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY] = handle_machine_check,
[EXIT_REASON_EPT_VIOLATION] = handle_ept_violation,
[EXIT_REASON_EPT_MISCONFIG] = handle_ept_misconfig,
+ [EXIT_REASON_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION] = handle_pause,
};
static const int kvm_vmx_max_exit_handlers =
[-- Attachment #3: kvm_ple_hrtimer_2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1273 bytes --]
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index b985a29..bd5a616 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ int kvm_is_visible_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn);
void mark_page_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn);
void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_resched(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_load_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index c0a929f..c4289c0 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1108,6 +1108,21 @@ void kvm_resched(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_resched);
+void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ ktime_t expires;
+ DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+
+ prepare_to_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+
+ /* Sleep for 100 us, and hope lock-holder got scheduled */
+ expires = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), 100000UL);
+ schedule_hrtimeout(&expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
+
+ finish_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_on_spin);
+
static int kvm_vcpu_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = vma->vm_file->private_data;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-09 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-23 14:04 [PATCH] [RESEND] KVM:VMX: Add support for Pause-Loop Exiting Zhai, Edwin
2009-09-23 14:09 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-25 1:11 ` Zhai, Edwin
2009-09-27 8:28 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-28 9:33 ` Zhai, Edwin
2009-09-29 12:05 ` Zhai, Edwin
2009-09-29 13:34 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-30 1:01 ` Zhai, Edwin
2009-09-30 6:28 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-30 16:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-10-02 18:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-10-09 10:03 ` Zhai, Edwin [this message]
2009-10-11 15:34 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-12 19:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-09-25 20:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-09-27 8:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-27 13:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-09-27 13:47 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-27 14:07 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-09-27 14:18 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-27 14:53 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-09-29 16:46 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACF0A68.6040906@intel.com \
--to=edwin.zhai@intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).