From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: Release plan for 0.12.0 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:17:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4AD5DD6B.2030703@codemonkey.ws> References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com> <200910081555.40897.jens@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4ACDF550.1020502@codemonkey.ws> <20091014132154.GA29037@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jens Osterkamp , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel , Paul Brook To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:4104 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756566AbZJNOTI (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:19:08 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1406409fga.1 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:17:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20091014132154.GA29037@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Looks like Or has abandoned it. I have an updated version which works > with new APIs, etc. Let me post it and we'll go from there. > > >> I'm generally inclined to oppose the functionality as I don't think it >> offers any advantages over the existing backends. >> > > I patch it in and use it all the time. It's much easier to setup > on a random machine than a bridged config. > Having two things that do the same thing is just going to lead to user confusion. If the problem is tap is too hard to setup, we should try to simplify tap configuration. Regards, Anthony Liguori