From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Xen PV-on-HVM guest support Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:30:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4AD6CF9E.2040706@redhat.com> References: <1255495978.26053.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4AD5738D.8070706@web.de> <9ae48b020910141249v12154451uc515b283ccfbd47e@mail.gmail.com> <4AD6CC7B.6070200@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ed Swierk , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58165 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754712AbZJOHbJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:31:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AD6CC7B.6070200@web.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/15/09 09:17, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Ed Swierk wrote: >> Overall it seems pretty solid for Linux PV-on-HVM guests. I think more >> work is needed to support full PV guests, but I don't know how much. >> Have folks been asking about PV-on-HVM or full PV? > > Not all requests weren't that concrete /wrt technology, but some had > older setups and were definitely using full PV. I had full pv working at some point as well, but I think those patches are almost a year old by now and need quite some work to make them work on todays master branch ... cheers, Gerd