From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
Subject: lspci says: "SCSI storage controller: Qumranet, Inc. Virtio block
 device". Is it really?
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:14:38 +0200
Message-ID: <4ADC582E.305@wpkg.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx03.syneticon.net ([78.111.66.105]:54283 "EHLO
	mx03.syneticon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754080AbZJSMOl (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:14:41 -0400
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

lspci implies that the virtio block device is a "SCSI storage 
controller", i.e.:

00:05.0 SCSI storage controller: Qumranet, Inc. Virtio block device


However, virtio block devide does not have much to do with SCSI (in 
sense: sdparm does not think it is a SCSI device; virtio_blk does not 
depend on any SCSI moduled like sd_mod).


Is "SCSI storage controller" a proper description for this device?


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org