From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: x86: Add VCPU substate for NMI states
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:06:36 +0900
Message-ID: <4ADD7D9C.4060605@redhat.com>
References: <20091015170535.5076.91206.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net> <20091015170536.5076.56790.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net> <20091019203254.GD17781@amt.cnet> <20091019203950.GC8278@redhat.com> <4ADCF771.9070709@redhat.com> <4ADD7B3C.5080607@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15729 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751386AbZJTJGi (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:06:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4ADD7B3C.5080607@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 10/20/2009 05:56 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> So save/restore kvm_vcpu_arch::exception? As another substate or as part
> of a generalized NMI substate?
>    

Yes.  It's not part of an nmi substate, but both can be part of an 
exception substate (but need to look at the docs vewy cawefuwy to make 
sure we don't screw up again).

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.