From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Add KVM support for Book3s_64 (PPC64) hosts v5 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:49:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4AE7167D.3020905@redhat.com> References: <1256137413-15256-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20091026230632.GB5366@lixom.net> <1256599237.3879.3.camel@slab> <4AE6B5C6.70404@redhat.com> <8E92E3B9-39D5-4D71-8B8E-96B49430B67B@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Olof Johansson , Hollis Blanchard , kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kvm-ppc , Arnd Bergmann , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Kevin Wolf , bphilips-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org, Marcelo Tosatti To: Alexander Graf Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8E92E3B9-39D5-4D71-8B8E-96B49430B67B-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> Sender: kvm-ppc-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 10/27/2009 03:42 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > I can, but it's only partly related. My patches don't even touch > timing.c. The only thing I can imagine resulting in a breakage is that > my patches allow for an =M setting. > > So IMHO this patch should be applied before my series. Should I stick > it as first patch in my git tree? > No need, I'll apply it independently. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function