From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add VirtIO Frame Buffer Support Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:53:05 +0200 Message-ID: <4AEFEF71.5010105@redhat.com> References: <1257199759-2941-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4AEFCBED.50804@redhat.com> <4AEFCCBA.9050408@redhat.com> <8BA1853F-11C9-44B1-9FDB-1DFDAED40E1B@suse.de> <4AEFCEDA.4030308@redhat.com> <87F51670-CB3F-431C-87B4-A8746F996C6F@suse.de> <4AEFDF35.3020806@redhat.com> <8EA2855E-4209-4CCA-9E87-1D652A72F8FE@suse.de> <4AEFE7DA.30105@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, anthony@codemonkey.ws To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7632 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751875AbZKCIxT (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:53:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/03/2009 10:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > Exactly. In fact, I'm even scared to reboot mine because I might end > up in a 3270 terminal. The whole text only crap keeps people from > using this platform! And that's what I want to change here. Ok. I oppose paravirtualization for its own sake and only support it if there's no other way to get performance. In this case it buys us basic functionality which is surprisingly missing on native, that's arguably even more important. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function