From: Gordan Bobic <gordan@bobich.net>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Virtualization Performance: Intel vs. AMD
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:29:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0080C2.1010309@bobich.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911151054.57510.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca>
Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> On Sun November 15 2009, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>>> The Core i7 has hyperthreading, so you see 8 logical CPUs.
>> Are you saying the AMD processors do not have hyperthreading?
>
> Course not. Hyperthreading is dubious at best.
That's a rather questionable answer to a rather broad issue. SMT is
useful, especially on processors with deep pipelines (think Pentium 4 -
and in general, deeper pipelines tend to be required for higher clock
speeds), because it reduces the number of context switches. Context
switches are certainly one of the most expensive operations if not the
most expensive operation you can do on a processor, and typically
requires flushing the pipelines. Double the number of hardware threads,
and you halve the number of context switches.
This typically isn't useful if your CPU is processing one
single-threaded application 99% of the time, but on a loaded server it
can make a significant difference to throughput.
Gordan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-15 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-15 12:22 Virtualization Performance: Intel vs. AMD Andreas Winkelbauer
2009-11-15 13:05 ` Neil Aggarwal
2009-11-15 15:55 ` Thomas Treutner
2009-11-16 10:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-17 10:23 ` Thomas Treutner
2009-11-15 15:56 ` Thomas Treutner
2009-11-15 17:33 ` Neil Aggarwal
2009-11-15 17:54 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-11-15 17:59 ` Neil Aggarwal
2009-11-15 22:29 ` Gordan Bobic [this message]
2009-11-15 23:03 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-11-15 23:50 ` Gordan Bobic
2009-11-16 12:02 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-16 12:10 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0080C2.1010309@bobich.net \
--to=gordan@bobich.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox