From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Breakage due to commit c1699988 ("v3: don't call reset functions on cpu initialization") Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:00:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4B0BAEB1.7010704@redhat.com> References: <4B094DC4.1000107@redhat.com> <20091123190059.GD11530@mothafucka.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM list To: Glauber Costa Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18140 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932285AbZKXKAP (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:00:15 -0500 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAOA0LBC005388 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:00:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091123190059.GD11530@mothafucka.localdomain> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/23/2009 09:00 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:42:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> A qemu-kvm which merges this commit breaks badly (see qemu-kvm.git next >> branch). In the commit log for this commit, you write >> "you" = Glauber Costa >> I tested it with qemu (with and without io-thread) and qemu-kvm, and it >> seems to be doing okay - although qemu-kvm uses a slightly different >> patch. >> >> Can you share the slightly different patch (against 'next') please? >> > Sorry, I don't follow. You said you tested it and it works, so what exactly > do we need from me here? > > No. _You_ tested it and it worked for you. qemu-kvm next fails badly (doesn't even run the bios). I need help from you in finding out why and fixing it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function