Re: Breakage due to commit c1699988 ("v3: don't call reset functions on cpu initialization")

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 11/23/2009 11:07 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Glauber Costa<glommer@redhat.com>  wrote:
>    
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:42:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>      
>>> A qemu-kvm which merges this commit breaks badly (see qemu-kvm.git next
>>> branch).  In the commit log for this commit, you write
>>>
>>>      I tested it with qemu (with and without io-thread) and qemu-kvm, and it
>>>      seems to be doing okay - although qemu-kvm uses a slightly different
>>> patch.
>>>
>>> Can you share the slightly different patch (against 'next') please?
>>>        
>> Sorry, I don't follow. You said you tested it and it works, so what exactly
>> do we need from me here?
>>      
> FYI: Combining that patch with a later fix from Juan fix the issue for qemu-kvm.
> (504c2948)
> Also, the patch seems to apply fine ontop of next.
>
> I can send a combined version if you want, or you can combine it yourself
>
>    

That commit is already merged.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function