From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] qemu-kvm: x86: Add support for VCPU event states Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:15:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4B0BEA8E.2090800@redhat.com> References: <4AFB5123.7000301@web.de> <4AFB515D.1030202@web.de> <4B00087C.4060007@redhat.com> <4B000E71.3020901@web.de> <4B000FBB.3000600@redhat.com> <4B0010CD.7000406@web.de> <4B001253.9040207@redhat.com> <4B001808.2080503@web.de> <4B0019EE.3000501@redhat.com> <4B002126.8020006@web.de> <4B002349.5090309@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm , Juan Quintela , Glauber Costa To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36382 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932940AbZKXOPi (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:15:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B002349.5090309@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/15/2009 05:50 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>> Shouldn't you create 13 now? >> No, I rather think Glauber's 12 should be downgraded to 11 - unless it >> misses the qemu merge windows for 0.12. My extensions definitely target >> that release, thus will likely carry 11 in upstream. And we should >> really try to avoid diverging again. > > Agree. Will commit the patches. Ugh, so I did it the hard way by merging upstream and porting it (incorrectly), then going back to my queue to see that you had already nicely prepared this for me. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function