From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Theurer <habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel bug in kvm_intel
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:41:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0DDCDC.30305@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B0DDB5D.9030202@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hello,
11/26/2009 10:35 AM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> I just tried testing tip of kvm.git, but unfortunately I think I might
> be hitting a different problem, where processes run 100% in kernel mode.
> In my case, cpus 9 and 13 were stuck, running qemu processes. A stack
> backtrace for both cpus are below. FWIW, kernel.org 2.6.32-rc7 does not
> have this problem, or the original problem.
2.6.32-rc7 doesn't have problem with kvm + oprofile? If the original
analysis was right, I can't think of anything which could have changed
that between the merge commit and 2.6.32-rc7.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-26 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-09 20:04 kernel bug in kvm_intel Andrew Theurer
2009-10-11 5:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-12 18:42 ` Andrew Theurer
2009-10-13 6:50 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-13 14:04 ` Andrew Theurer
2009-10-14 17:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-15 20:18 ` Andrew Theurer
2009-10-30 18:07 ` Andrew Theurer
2009-10-31 15:47 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-31 16:25 ` Andrew Theurer
2009-10-31 16:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-31 16:38 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-01 10:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-01 10:20 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-01 10:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-01 11:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-18 9:26 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-26 1:35 ` Andrew Theurer
2009-11-26 1:41 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-11-26 10:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-26 13:47 ` Andrew Theurer
2009-11-29 14:46 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-30 16:27 ` Andrew Theurer
2009-10-13 14:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0DDCDC.30305@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).