Re: [PATCH 0/3] Split up pv-ops

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 12/03/2009 04:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>    
>> Paravirt ops is currently only capable of either replacing a lot of Linux
>> internal code or none at all. The are users that don't need all of the
>> possibilities pv-ops delivers though.
>>
>> On KVM for example we're perfectly fine not using the PV MMU, thus not
>> touching any MMU code. That way we don't have to improve pv-ops to become
>> fast, we just don't compile the MMU parts in!
>>
>> This patchset splits pv-ops into several smaller config options split by
>> feature category and then converts the KVM pv-ops code to use only the
>> bits that are required, lowering overhead.
>>
>>      
> So has this ended up in some tree yet?
>    

Don't think so.  I suggest you copy lkml and Ingo.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function