Re: [PATCH 0/3] Split up pv-ops

[Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/03/2009 04:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Alexander Graf wrote:
>>   
>>> Paravirt ops is currently only capable of either replacing a lot of
>>> Linux
>>> internal code or none at all. The are users that don't need all of the
>>> possibilities pv-ops delivers though.
>>>
>>> On KVM for example we're perfectly fine not using the PV MMU, thus not
>>> touching any MMU code. That way we don't have to improve pv-ops to
>>> become
>>> fast, we just don't compile the MMU parts in!
>>>
>>> This patchset splits pv-ops into several smaller config options
>>> split by
>>> feature category and then converts the KVM pv-ops code to use only the
>>> bits that are required, lowering overhead.
>>>
>>>      
>> So has this ended up in some tree yet?
>>    
>
> Don't think so.  I suggest you copy lkml and Ingo.

Sending off the complete set again? Rebased against what?