From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Split up pv-ops
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:07:48 +0200
Message-ID: <4B17D444.6060702@redhat.com>
References: <1258503192-14246-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4B17D0C7.1020805@suse.de> <4B17D290.9040507@redhat.com> <4B17D390.5050602@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40098 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752134AbZLCPHs (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:07:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4B17D390.5050602@suse.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/03/2009 05:04 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Don't think so.  I suggest you copy lkml and Ingo.
>>      
> Sending off the complete set again?

Yes.

> Rebased against what?
>    

tip's x86/paravirt seems like a good choice (though only one patch is in 
there at present).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function