From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Installing kernel headers in kvm-kmod
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:42:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B2124F6.9090606@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912101625.20134.arnd@arndb.de>
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 10 December 2009, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Maybe even /usr/local/include/kvm-kmod-$version/...., and a symlink
>> /usr/local/include/kvm-kmod.
>
> Depends on how fine-grained you want to do the packaging.
> Most distributions split packages between code and development
> packages. The kvm-kmod code is the kernel module, so you want
> to be able to install it for multiple kernels simultaneously.
>
> Building the package only requires one version of the header
> and does not depend on the underlying kernel version, only
> on the version of the module, so it's reasonable to install only
> one version as the -dev package, and have a dependency
> in there to match the module version with the header version.
>
> The most complex setup would split the development package
> into one per kernel version and/or module version, plus an
> extra package for the module version containing only the
> symlink. I wouldn't go there.
I've just (forced-)pushed the "simple" version with
/usr/include/kvm-kmod as destination. The user headers are now stored
under usr/include in the kvm-kmod sources and installed from there.
>
>>> It may also be useful to do the equivalent of 'make headers_install'
>>> from the kernel, to remove all "#ifdef __KERNEL__" sections and
>>> sparse annotations from the header files, but it should also work
>>> without that.
>>>
>> Well, qemu.git needs __user removed.
>
> This one is taken care of by kvm_kmod in the sync script, though it
> would be cleaner to only do it for the installed version of the header,
> not for the one used to build kvm.ko.
It's easy to drop, but I wonder why it was introduced. To allow reusing
the headers for user space?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-10 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-10 13:07 Installing kernel headers in kvm-kmod Anthony Liguori
2009-12-10 13:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-10 13:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-12-10 14:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-10 15:01 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-10 15:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-10 16:42 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2009-12-10 16:44 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-10 17:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-12-10 20:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-10 20:36 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-10 21:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-10 15:01 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B2124F6.9090606@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox