public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Enable non page boundary BAR device assignment
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:47:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B27D9C7.7020402@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091215183840.GA25724@redhat.com>

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 07:30:26PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>   
>> While trying to get device passthrough working with an emulex hba, kvm
>> refused to pass it through because it has a BAR of 256 bytes:
>>
>>         Region 0: Memory at d2100000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
>>         Region 2: Memory at d2101000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
>>         Region 4: I/O ports at b100 [size=256]
>>
>> Since the page boundary is an arbitrary optimization to allow 1:1 mapping of
>> physical to virtual addresses, we can still take the old MMIO callback route.
>>
>> So let's add a second code path that allows for size & 0xFFF != 0 sized regions
>> by looping it through userspace.
>>
>> I verified that it works by passing through an e1000 with this additional patch
>> applied and the card acted the same way it did without this patch:
>>
>>              map_func = assigned_dev_iomem_map;
>> -            if (cur_region->size & 0xFFF) {
>> +            if (i != PCI_ROM_SLOT){
>>                  fprintf(stderr, "PCI region %d at address 0x%llx "
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
>>     
>
>
> Looks good.
> 1 question:
>
>   
>> ---
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>>
>>   - don't use map_func function pointer
>>   - use the same code for mmap on fast and slow path
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>>
>>   - address mst's comments
>> ---
>>  hw/device-assignment.c |  117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/device-assignment.c b/hw/device-assignment.c
>> index 13a86bb..000fa61 100644
>> --- a/hw/device-assignment.c
>> +++ b/hw/device-assignment.c
>> @@ -148,6 +148,105 @@ static uint32_t assigned_dev_ioport_readl(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
>>      return value;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static uint32_t slow_bar_readb(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>> +{
>> +    AssignedDevRegion *d = opaque;
>> +    uint8_t *in = d->u.r_virtbase + addr;
>> +    uint32_t r;
>> +
>> +    r = *in;
>> +    DEBUG("slow_bar_readl addr=0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " val=0x%08x\n", addr, r);
>> +
>> +    return r;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static uint32_t slow_bar_readw(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>> +{
>> +    AssignedDevRegion *d = opaque;
>> +    uint16_t *in = d->u.r_virtbase + addr;
>> +    uint32_t r;
>> +
>> +    r = *in;
>> +    DEBUG("slow_bar_readl addr=0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " val=0x%08x\n", addr, r);
>> +
>> +    return r;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static uint32_t slow_bar_readl(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
>> +{
>> +    AssignedDevRegion *d = opaque;
>> +    uint32_t *in = d->u.r_virtbase + addr;
>> +    uint32_t r;
>> +
>> +    r = *in;
>> +    DEBUG("slow_bar_readl addr=0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " val=0x%08x\n", addr, r);
>> +
>> +    return r;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void slow_bar_writeb(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr, uint32_t val)
>> +{
>> +    AssignedDevRegion *d = opaque;
>> +    uint8_t *out = d->u.r_virtbase + addr;
>> +
>> +    DEBUG("slow_bar_writeb addr=0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " val=0x%02x\n", addr, val);
>> +    *out = val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void slow_bar_writew(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr, uint32_t val)
>> +{
>> +    AssignedDevRegion *d = opaque;
>> +    uint16_t *out = d->u.r_virtbase + addr;
>> +
>> +    DEBUG("slow_bar_writew addr=0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " val=0x%04x\n", addr, val);
>> +    *out = val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void slow_bar_writel(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr, uint32_t val)
>> +{
>> +    AssignedDevRegion *d = opaque;
>> +    uint32_t *out = d->u.r_virtbase + addr;
>> +
>> +    DEBUG("slow_bar_writel addr=0x" TARGET_FMT_plx " val=0x%08x\n", addr, val);
>> +    *out = val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static CPUWriteMemoryFunc * const slow_bar_write[] = {
>> +    &slow_bar_writeb,
>> +    &slow_bar_writew,
>> +    &slow_bar_writel
>> +};
>> +
>> +static CPUReadMemoryFunc * const slow_bar_read[] = {
>> +    &slow_bar_readb,
>> +    &slow_bar_readw,
>> +    &slow_bar_readl
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void assigned_dev_iomem_map_slow(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int region_num,
>> +                                        pcibus_t e_phys, pcibus_t e_size,
>> +                                        int type)
>> +{
>> +    AssignedDevice *r_dev = container_of(pci_dev, AssignedDevice, dev);
>> +    AssignedDevRegion *region = &r_dev->v_addrs[region_num];
>> +    PCIRegion *real_region = &r_dev->real_device.regions[region_num];
>> +    int m;
>> +
>> +    DEBUG("slow map\n");
>> +    m = cpu_register_io_memory(slow_bar_read, slow_bar_write, region);
>> +    cpu_register_physical_memory(e_phys, e_size, m);
>> +
>> +    /* MSI-X MMIO page */
>> +    if ((e_size > 0) &&
>> +        real_region->base_addr <= r_dev->msix_table_addr &&
>> +        real_region->base_addr + real_region->size >= r_dev->msix_table_addr) {
>> +        int offset = r_dev->msix_table_addr - real_region->base_addr;
>> +
>> +        cpu_register_physical_memory(e_phys + offset,
>> +                TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, r_dev->mmio_index);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void assigned_dev_iomem_map(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int region_num,
>>                                     pcibus_t e_phys, pcibus_t e_size, int type)
>>  {
>> @@ -381,15 +480,22 @@ static int assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion *io_regions,
>>  
>>          /* handle memory io regions */
>>          if (cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
>> +            int slow_map = 0;
>>              int t = cur_region->type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH
>>                  ? PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH
>>                  : PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
>> +
>>              if (cur_region->size & 0xFFF) {
>> -                fprintf(stderr, "Unable to assign device: PCI region %d "
>> -                        "at address 0x%llx has size 0x%x, "
>> -                        " which is not a multiple of 4K\n",
>> +                fprintf(stderr, "PCI region %d at address 0x%llx "
>> +                        "has size 0x%x, which is not a multiple of 4K. "
>> +                        "You might experience some performance hit due to that.\n",
>>                          i, (unsigned long long)cur_region->base_addr,
>>                          cur_region->size);
>> +                slow_map = 1;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            if (slow_map && (i == PCI_ROM_SLOT)) {
>> +                fprintf(stderr, "ROM not aligned - can't continue\n");
>>                  return -1;
>>     
>
> Why is this? Can't ROM be handled in the same way?
> I think it was previously ...
>   

You can't execute code from MMIO regions, so slow_map doesn't work there.

>   
>>              }
>>  
>> @@ -405,7 +511,7 @@ static int assigned_dev_register_regions(PCIRegion *io_regions,
>>              } else {
>>                  pci_dev->v_addrs[i].u.r_virtbase =
>>                      mmap(NULL,
>> -                         (cur_region->size + 0xFFF) & 0xFFFFF000,
>> +                         cur_region->size,
>>     
>
> Hmm, one assumes this code did work at some point ...
> do you know why was it done this way?
>   

Nope :-).

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-15 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-15 18:30 [PATCH 0/3] Device Assignment fixes Alexander Graf
2009-12-15 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] Enable non page boundary BAR device assignment Alexander Graf
2009-12-15 18:38   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 18:47     ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2009-12-15 18:50       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 19:04         ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-15 19:50           ` Chris Wright
2009-12-15 21:12             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-16  5:44               ` Chris Wright
2009-12-15 21:04           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 21:11             ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-16  5:47               ` Chris Wright
2009-12-16 10:41                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] Split off sysfs id retrieval Alexander Graf
2009-12-15 18:39   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 18:54     ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-15 21:05       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 19:57     ` Chris Wright
2009-12-15 18:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] Inform users about busy device assignment attempt Alexander Graf
2009-12-15 18:41   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 20:28   ` Chris Wright
2009-12-15 21:09     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 21:10     ` Alexander Graf
2009-12-15 23:13       ` Chris Wright
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-17 15:04 [PATCH 0/3] Device Assignment fixes Alexander Graf
2009-12-17 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] Enable non page boundary BAR device assignment Alexander Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B27D9C7.7020402@suse.de \
    --to=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=muli@il.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox