From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Discordant results between UnixBench and nBench
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:37:49 +0200
Message-ID: <4B31F2FD.4010201@redhat.com>
References: <c59a6b1d0912230143h10af966ubea577a180cacc8b@mail.gmail.com> 	<4B31E88B.6020002@redhat.com> <c59a6b1d0912230235n7afd5a22ie714539b1dd4c94@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Matthieu Olivier <ppmarcel@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50112 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753694AbZLWKhw (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:37:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <c59a6b1d0912230235n7afd5a22ie714539b1dd4c94@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/23/2009 12:35 PM, Matthieu Olivier wrote:
>
> To tell the truth, I had to test some others hypervisors, so now I
> don't have KVM installed anymore.
> I used top for following bench progress on 2 or 3 VM, but
> unfortunately I did not catch their output in a file, neither I used
> kvm_stat (by ignorance of its existence).
>    

Well, in order to make progress we need more measurements.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function